Jane Austen's View on the Industrial Revolution in Pride and Prejudice

Aralia Heaverly, Elisabeth Ngestirosa EWK

Abstract


This study dismantles Jane Austen’s view in Pride and Prejudice novel triggered by the social systems in British society. The society influenced by the phenomena of the industrial revolution in England in the late eighteenth century revealed the social system. This study aims to find out how Jane Austen views the revolution of the industry in British society. By having the focus on the sociology of literature, this study applies Lucien Goldman’s genetic structuralism. By the dialectical method, the study found that in Austen’s view the landed gentry system and inheritance system was adopted to measure the social class among the societies. Jane Austen thought the inheritance system as the fallacious practice in the society as the economic condition motivated British parents to apply matchmaking for their children to get a better life. Jane Austen views that the industrial revolution plays an important role in forming social occupation at that time. The working-class condition leads them to work in the town, while the upper-class society tends to open some businesses by doing trade at the town. The rest group of middle class tends to work and dedicate themselves to the rich people. Finally, Jane Austen puts her view toward the society in Pride and Prejudice.


Keywords: author, class, genetic structuralism, the industrial revolution, view


Full Text:

PDF

References


Afrianto & Gulö, Ingatan (2019). Revisiting English competence at hotel. Teknosastik: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 17(1), 35-39.

Amelia, Dina & Dintasi, F. D. (2019). Ephebophilia suffered by the main character. Teknosastik: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 15( 2), 81-86.

Ahmed, Shokhan Rasool. (2015). The topography of England and Englishness in Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice”. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 3(8), 28-36.

Aryangga, Afri & Nurmaily, Ely. (2017). Women’s power and stereotype denial in Pocahontas movie. Teknosastik: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 15(1), 46-52.

Austen, J. (2017). Pride and Prejudice. Scotts Valley: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform.

Austen, J. (2009). Letter of Jane Austen. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bates, R. A. (2015). The sociological perspective. The Journal of Public and Professional Sociology, 7(1), 1–7.

Berlanstein, L. (2017). The Industrial Revolution and Work in Nineteenth-Century Europe. London: Taylor & Francis e-Library.

Bertens, H. (2018). Literary Theory. London: Taylor & Francis e-Library.

Braun, Carlos Rodríguez. (2017). Piketty misreads Austen. The Independent Review, 21(3), 465-476

Cooper, K. & White, R. E. (2012). Qualitative Research in the Post-Modern Era: Contexts of Qualitative Research. New York: Springer. Creswell, J. W. & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. New York: Sage Publications.

Faruk, A. (2012). Metode Penelitian Sastra: Sebuah Penjelasan Awal. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Faruk, A. (1994). Pengantar Sosiologi Sastra: Dari Strukturalisme Genetik sampai Post Modernisme. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Goldmann, L. (1980). Essays on Method in the Sociology of Literature. New York: Telos Press.

Greene, D. J. (1953). Jane Austen and the Peerage. Modern Language Association. 68(5), 1017-1031.

Hume, R. D. (2013). Money in Jane Austen. The Review of English Studies, 64(264), 289-310.

Jadhav, A. M. & Hall, J. (2014). The Historical Development of the Sociological Approach to the Study of Literature."Innovative Research & Development, 3(5), 658–662.

Kardiansyah, M. Yuseano. (2018). Sebab Cinta dan Dosa. Sleman: Deepublish.

Kristic, A. (2015). Marriage and Women in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice. Retrieved from repositorij.ffos.hr Lanuza, G. (2016). The Dialectical Foundations of Marx's Sociology of Conflict: Methodological Implications for the Study of Conflicts. Philippine Sociological Review, 64, 103-133.

Malik, N. (2017). ”The Industrial Revolution : How it affects Victorian literature in a progressive or adverse way."International Journal of Advanced Educational Research, 2(6), 156–157.

Pittock, Malcolm. (2003). "Jane Austen and her Critics". The Cambridge Quarterly, 32(3), 251-275.

Smith, Sidonie & Watson, Julia. (2001). Reading Autobiography: A Guide for Interpreting Life Narratives. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.

Suprayogi. (2019). Javanese varieties in Pringsewu regency and their origins. Teknosastik: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 17(1), 7-14.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33365/llj.v1i1.216

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.